Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge has said that any decision on leadership in Karnataka will be made solely by the party’s national leadership. His comments, delivered on Monday, came amid persistent rumours that Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar could assume the top role in the coming months. “This is left to the high command; they have the power to take further action,” Mr Kharge told reporters when asked about the speculation. “Unnecessarily, one should not create a problem.” His remarks followed a statement from Karnataka legislator H A Iqbal Hussain, who suggested a leadership change could occur within two or three months. “The high command is aware of the situation and will take an appropriate decision at the right time,” Mr Hussain said. He referred to “revolutionary political developments” expected after September, further fuelling uncertainty over the stability of the state administration. Mr Hussain also emphasised that the Congress high command had decided the contours of government formation after the party’s decisive victory in the May 2023 Assembly elections. At the time, intense negotiations resulted in Mr Siddaramaiah becoming Chief Minister and Mr Shivakumar accepting the deputy role. Reports emerged of a potential power-sharing arrangement under which Mr Shivakumar would take over the leadership after two-and-a-half years, though no formal confirmation was ever provided. The current debate has coincided with a three-day visit to Karnataka by Congress General Secretary Randeep Singh Surjewala. He is holding meetings with legislators and party officials as part of what he described as a “routine organisational exercise” to assess the government’s performance. “This is purely an organisational exercise,” Mr Surjewala said. “Unlike what is being projected—which is a figment of the media’s imagination—these meetings are not to collect feedback for a change at the helm.” However, the timing of the review has raised questions within political circles. Cooperation Minister K N Rajanna has also hinted at major political developments later this year, and several Congress members have publicly voiced grievances about governance and administration. On Monday, Mr Surjewala held discussions with Aland legislator B R Patil, who has alleged corruption and inefficiency in the allocation of government housing. Mr Patil submitted documents to support his claims. “I appraised Mr Surjewala on issues plaguing the state,” he said. “It is up to the high command to act.” Another legislator, Raju Kage, who has criticised the government’s functioning, postponed his meeting with Mr Surjewala due to other commitments but confirmed he would share his concerns soon. Meanwhile, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which leads India’s federal government and is the main opposition in Karnataka, seized on the uncertainty. BJP spokesperson Shehzad Poonawala claimed Mr Kharge’s comments showed that decisions were ultimately controlled by the Gandhi family, which includes senior leaders Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi. Late on Monday, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and Deputy Chief Minister Shivakumar met Mr Surjewala to discuss appointments to several state-run boards and corporations. According to officials in the Chief Minister’s Office, about 1,400 director positions and six chairperson posts have been vacant for two years and are now likely to be filled. In separate statements, both Mr Siddaramaiah and Mr Shivakumar downplayed any suggestion of an imminent leadership change, emphasising the importance of strengthening the party organisation as the government nears the halfway point of its term. Context The Congress party’s internal debate over leadership in Karnataka reflects broader challenges the organisation faces in maintaining unity after high-stakes electoral wins. Karnataka is the largest southern state governed by Congress, and any instability risks weakening the party’s prospects ahead of national elections. Observers note that speculation about a rotational Chief Minister arrangement has been a recurring theme since the government was formed last year. With the administration approaching its second anniversary, the review process is seen by some analysts as an opportunity for the high command to recalibrate its strategy amid competing ambitions within the state leadership.