An Indian woman in Canada has condemned biased rental ads by NRI landlords, citing exclusion based on caste, religion, and dietary preferences.
A Reddit post from an Indian woman residing in Canada has ignited conversation around discriminatory housing practices among some landlords in the South Asian immigrant community. The post, directed at Non-Resident Indians (NRIs), expressed dismay over recurring rental listings that enforce culturally exclusionary conditions.
“It’s always something like ‘Only Gujarati girl,’ or ‘Punjabi-speaking vegetarian girl preferred,’” she wrote, adding that other listings have included stipulations such as “South Indian girls only, no boy inquiries please,” or “Strictly vegetarian, no non-veg even from outside.”
The woman, whose identity remains undisclosed, described these practices as "insanely moronic" and called out landlords for disregarding Canadian laws that prohibit discrimination in housing. “You’re not in India anymore, where you can get away with putting up caste, language and dietary restrictions in rental ads like it’s normal,” she stated in the widely viewed post.
Recurring Exclusionary Practices
The post highlighted how landlords within the Indian diaspora sometimes post ads that echo rigid social norms from back home. Conditions based on native language, religion, caste, and gender have all been cited in rental advertisements circulated online and through community groups.
One user from Vancouver shared a personal experience of a listing that offered free accommodation in exchange for daily cooking—for five male tenants—raising concerns about the blurred lines between housing and exploitative arrangements. “It felt more like a matrimonial ad than a rental offer,” the user wrote.
Another recounted being offered a shared space separated by only a curtain, prompting them to avoid renting from Indian landlords altogether.
Legal and Cultural Disconnect
While some commenters defended the landlords’ right to select tenants they feel comfortable with, others questioned how such practices persist in a country like Canada, where housing discrimination is prohibited by law. The Canadian Human Rights Act and various provincial codes make it illegal for landlords to refuse tenants based on race, religion, gender, or dietary habits.
“This isn’t about personal comfort—it’s about legality and decency,” said one Reddit respondent. “Canada has laws, and immigrants should adapt to the standards here.”
The original poster suggested that if landlords find it difficult to rent their properties without imposing such restrictions, they might consider alternative arrangements, such as sharing their home with family members instead of tenants.
Context:
Canada’s housing market, particularly in urban centres like Toronto and Vancouver, is experiencing a growing influx of renters from diverse backgrounds. According to Statistics Canada, the country’s foreign-born population reached over eight million in 2021, with South Asians forming the largest visible minority group.
Yet, housing discrimination remains a concern. Studies have shown that racialised renters often face covert forms of bias, including being asked intrusive personal questions or being subjected to invasive conditions unrelated to tenancy.
This episode underscores a broader issue: how certain cultural biases persist even among diaspora populations living in liberal democracies. As Canada continues to prioritise inclusion and human rights, such posts reflect the gap between legal norms and community practices.
Conclusion:
The Reddit post has struck a chord with many across Canada’s South Asian diaspora, serving as a reminder that landlords—regardless of their cultural background—must abide by local housing laws. While personal preferences may influence how some approach rental agreements, Canadian regulations mandate fairness and equality in housing access.
As debate continues online, the incident has opened a necessary conversation about integration, respect for legal standards, and the evolving identity of immigrant communities abroad.