Sourav Ganguly Supports Gautam Gambhir Amid Eden Gardens Pitch Debate

Batting legend Sourav Ganguly has expressed his support for fellow cricketer Gautam Gambhir as discussions intensify regarding the pitch conditions at Eden Gardens during the first Test between India and South Africa. The match unfolded on a surface that produced significant turn, a condition Gambhir had previously requested from the ground staff. However, this strategy backfired, leading to India's defeat as they struggled against the South African spin attack while attempting to chase a relatively modest target of 124 runs.

None of the Indian batsmen managed to score a half-century in the match, while South African captain Temba Bavuma made a crucial contribution with a determined 55 runs in the second innings, a performance that ultimately helped secure victory for his team.

Ganguly has rallied behind Gambhir's viewpoint regarding the Eden Gardens pitch, asserting that the loss was more indicative of India's batting issues rather than the nature of the pitch. He articulated that a target of 124 should have been achievable under normal circumstances, irrespective of the pitch's behaviour.

"I completely agree with Gautam Gambhir. 124 was chaseable on this pitch. There was no question about it," Sourav Ganguly stated in an interview with India Today. He elaborated on his view by analysing the performance of South African spinner Simon Harmer, noting that the bowler effectively varied his deliveries, mixing straighter balls with the occasional turning delivery.

The decision to prepare a pitch that offered sharp turn from the onset has come under scrutiny from former players and analysts alike, many of whom believe it may have compromised India’s competitive edge. Critics argue that the choice of surface lacked balance and may have ultimately hindered the home side’s chances.

Ganguly further articulated that the defeat was not a direct consequence of the pitch conditions, emphasising that India’s batting approach was the core issue. He pointed out that the pitch's behaviour was typical for a Day 3 Test match and did not warrant the negative feedback it received.

"It was not a vicious turning pitch. It was a pitch on which you needed to bat as if you were playing a five-day Test, not a 50-over match or a Twenty20 where, after three dot balls, you try to play a break-out-of-jail shot. That’s the issue. One hundred and twenty-four should have been chased with at least five wickets in hand with the kind of batting line-up India had," he explained.

Ganguly underscored that it was not the pitch that was to blame, but rather the Indian batsmen's technique and mindset during the match.

"People are calling it a spinning pitch. It was nothing vicious. Poor technique and poor temperament have landed us in this situation," he concluded, reflecting on the team's performance and mindset at Eden Gardens.